Skip to main content

Non-Profit to Continue Lawsuit Against Town of Oyster Bay After FOIL Request Fulfilled

The New York City based group filed the lawsuit earlier this month. Reclaim New York announced that they have decided to continue the lawsuit against the Town of Oyster Bay after they recently fulfilled the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) request. The New York City based non-profit sued the Town as well as two Nassau County school districts for allegedly refusing to comply with New York State’s FOIL law by either denying or ignoring requests made by the group for information on contracts and expenditures. Last week, the Town of Oyster Bay fulfilled the request and provided the information to the group. However, the group will continue to pursue the lawsuit stating that the Town only fulfilled the request because of "negative press" from the lawsuit and they should "pay the attorney fees associated with the litigation," a press release from Reclaim reads. “No individual should have to do what Reclaim has done to produce this information," the press release reads. "New Yorkers should not have to beg or expend valuable time and money to force towns like Oyster Bay to comply with the law. " The Town said in a statement that they did not ignore the request, but rather "worked to successfully compile the roughly 1,400 documents that was requested in a timely manner." "There was never any intent on the Town’s part to not respond to this FOIL request. Contrary to their assertion, the recent compliance of this FOIL had nothing to do with the lawsuit that was filed, instead, it was the timely compilation of the documents that allowed the Town to ultimately release it," the statement read. According to the group's website, a total of 253 FOIL requests were sent to 13 Towns, 97 Villages, and 125 school districts on Long Island (and county offices) since start of their transparency project in May. Out of the 253 requests, a total of 57 were incomplete, 38 were denied, and 196 were completed. In addition to the Town of Oyster Bay, the group claims that the Towns of Islip, Riverhead, Babylon, and Hempstead also have not complied. The Town of Oyster Bay denied the request, the Town of Hempstead asked for $4,000 to provide the requested documents and the Town of North Hempstead complied "only after the project was announced," the group wrote on their website. In addition, about 25 percent of local Villages did not comply, 17 out of the 125 total school districts have ignored or denied the requests and 17 percent of school districts have still not sent back records, according to the group. "The Town of Oyster Bay’s refusal is particularly disturbing in light of scandals like Harendra Singh’s alleged bribery and loan scheme," the group wrote in a press release. Oyster Bay ignored a formal appeal, and follow up phone calls, after requesting a 20 day extension, according to the group. The Town of Oyster Bay told Newsday that they are "working on compiling the roughly 1400 pages of information and will notify the group of its availability as soon as possible.” The Elmont School District, which recently came under fire for paying Thomas Galante even after he was fired for abusing taxpayer dollars as CEO of the Queens Library, told the group that they did not have records that tracked payments to vendors and ignored a formal appeal from Reclaim New York, according to the release. Superintendent Al Harper said in a statement that “under state law, the district is not legally required to alter existing records by redaction or otherwise to respond to a FOIL request,” and also claimed that some of their records were "not in the format that the group requested," Newsday reports. The Manhasset School District denied Reclaim’s FOIL request for records they are "legally obligated to provide," the group said. Superintendent Charlie Cardillo told Newsday that they declined to release vendor information partially because it includes Social Security numbers and addresses which could not be redacted “without unreasonable time and effort." "We denied their request for those specific reasons, and not to avoid transparency about District expenditures,” they told Newsday. Reclaim New York stated that they plan to use the information they received from Long Island will be included in a new, searchable online database as a public resource will allow any citizen to see how their taxpayer dollars are being spent, the group said.
The Reclaim NY Website: http://www.reclaimnewyork.org/transparency/new-york-transparency-project/long-island-foil-results/
Please See Videos Here: https://www.facebook.com/reclaimnewyork/videos
More Information Here:

Newsday Article: Oyster Bay, 2 school districts, sued to disclose spending
http://www.newsday.com/long-island/nassau/group-to-sue-3-nassau-communities-of-lack-of-transparency-1.11885184

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Peter Mantius: Crestwood LPG won robo-approval - FOIL proves that there are no records showing that the Board of Regents has appointed a “state geologist” or “acting state geologist” since 2010

Gov. Andrew Cuomo should waste no time resolving the latest controversy over a Texas company’s application for a permit to store liquid petroleum gas, or LPG, in unlined salt caverns next to Seneca Lake. At issue is whether a specifically designated “state geologist” has a legal responsibility to conduct a rigorous analysis of such potentially dangerous activity or whether a simple undocumented sign-off by — well, anybody — will do. In its six-year bid to win that underground storage permit, Crestwood Equity Partners has made a practice of hiding documents, fudging facts and co-opting state regulators and local officials. Last week the company was called to task by the Seneca Lake Pure Waters Association for dodging a fundamental rule of the state Department of Environmental Conservation. The first sentence of the DEC’s “underground gas storage permitting process” states that such permits may only be granted with “approval in writing from the State Geologist.” SLPWA notes th
Post a Comment
Read more

FOCUS ON: NY Appellate Court Judge Thomas Dickerson

Thomas A. Dickerson is a former Yonkers city councilman and city court judge is now a judge on the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.  He was designated to this Division in 2006 and his term on the Supreme Court ends on December 31, 2017. Controversy Appellate Court Judge Thomas A. Dickerson, 72, a former Green Beret paratrooper in Vietnam who made an off-color joke from the bench in October 2014. When a female attorney arguing in a motorcycle accident noted she had never ridden one, Dickerson said she would “look good in leather,” the legal-news site Above the Law reported. He later apologized. “It blew a whole career,” the court insider said. When judges turn 70, they can apply for certification to stay on the bench. They can apply for recertification at 72 and 74 but cannot serve past 76. http://abovethelaw.com/2014/10/law-school-dean-turns-judges-sexist-snafu-into-a-teachable-moment/ Education Judge Dickerson received his B.A. degree
Post a Comment
Read more

WELCOME TO THE POLICE STATE: ‘Retaliation for use of the Open Records Act will inhibit every citizen from using it.’

A North Georgia newspaper publisher was indicted on a felony charge and jailed overnight last week – for filing an open-records request. Fannin Focus publisher Mark Thomason, along with his attorney Russell Stookey, were arrested on Friday and charged with attempted identity fraud and identity fraud. Thomason was also accused of making a false statement in his records request. Thomason’s relentless pursuit of public records relating to the local Superior Court has incensed the court’s chief judge, Brenda Weaver, who also chairs the state Judicial Qualifications Commission. Weaver took the matter to the district attorney, who obtained the indictments. Thomason was charged June 24 with making a false statement in an open-records request in which he asked for copies of checks “cashed illegally.” Thomason and Stookey were also charged with identity fraud and attempted identity fraud because they did not get Weaver’s approval before sending subpoenas to banks where Weaver and another j
Post a Comment
Read more